I’ve been in Beijing for just under a week, observing the final rehearsals and performance of nine pieces selected from the past five years of ArtsCross. The programme for the show on 23rd October consisted of works by chorographers from Beijing, Taipei and London. The pieces were reworked in various ways and included some of the original dancers and some new performers.
As a spectator and academic participant in ArtsCross since 2011, it was very moving to watch not only the culminations of these particular nine creative processes but to feel the weight of other collaborations behind them (other choreographers, dancers and academics involved in the project during the past five years).
While watching the dress rehearsals last Wednesday, I was struck particularly by the ghosts of the dancers from the earlier versions of the pieces – they seemed extremely present in their absence. I’ve been musing on the way that the original works have been translated to these new bodies and then translated again into ‘new’ works for the audience.
The new combinations of performers and choreographers created exciting differences and in some cases completely new material. Zhao Liang’s Infinite Connections, where an ensemble of dancers show a journey through life through winding and unwinding themselves along and between a giant piece of elastic, had to go beyond a simple recreation of the original work because the dancers (a combination of the original cast and new performers) needed to solve the concrete problem of how to negotiate the elastic as a group.
Taipei based choreographer Su
Guo Lei has also developed his Mask piece, since its premiere in London in 2012. The version performed at Beijing Dance Academy last week is part of a larger project to
Both London based choreographers Jonathan Lunn and Rachel Lopez de la Nieta created new material with their new groups of performers for Beijing Man and Beijing Bucket Blues, developing their devised approaches and giving dancers specific improvisational tasks which were then worked and fixed to become the final performance scores.
So, despite a shorter rehearsal period than for the original performances, each of the choreographers has taken into account the passing of time and the change of the
…’Change’ is an integral part of the process of ‘exchange’… One does not simply take one object and use it in exchange for another object. A more complicated process is involved. One takes what one has… and uses it in such a way as to enable something … to germinate, grow, bear fruit and ‘become’ something else, something that is different yet still bears important and essential similarities to its source. (p. 175)
The processes of ‘change’ that have taken place during the five years of ArtsCross have occurred in multifarious ways that participants are still reflecting upon, and will continue to do so as thoughts turn to how the project might be developed in the future. This was
Beijing dancer, Zhao Zhibo has been involved in Arts Cross since 2009 and feels that it has fundamentally changed the ways she has understood her practice. She relished the opportunity to improvise with London and Taipei based choreographers and has begun to develop her own teaching at the Beijing Dance Academy integrating improvisational techniques. Likewise, dancer Azurra Ardovini from London has also
The project has facilitated many processes of ‘change’ on a range of scales and as has been
We shall not cease from exploration
And the end of all our exploring
Will be to arrive where we started
And know the place for the first time.